Manufacturing Automation

Unlock Exclusive Access for FREE

Subscribe
Flash Story:

Last Tooth Error in Gear Shaping: Analysing the Error, Detection and Prevention in gears cut on the CNC Gear Shaping machine

Last Tooth Error in Gear Shaping: Analysing the Error, Detection and Prevention in gears cut on the CNC Gear Shaping machine
  • By Vishwajit Rajkumar Kothari, Director Cyber Gear

Abstract

Last Tooth Error (LTE) is a distinctive surface imperfection encountered in the gear shaping process, particularly in helical gears. It manifests as a linear mark on the tooth flank at the completion of the finish rotary pass. Although subtle, LTE can significantly affect gear quality perception and, in some cases, functional performance. This article explains the nature of Last Tooth Error, differentiates it from sudden variations, discusses its probable causes, and outlines best practices for detection and prevention.

Introduction

Gear shaping is a highly synchronised generating process in which the cutter and workpiece rotate in a precisely timed relationship. Any transient disturbance in this synchronisation—especially at the completion of a rotary cycle—can leave behind a visible signature on the gear tooth flank. One such signature is known as Last Tooth Error (LTE).

LTE is often overlooked because it may not consistently appear in conventional inspection graphs. However, with increasing helix angles and higher machine dynamics, its occurrence has become more noticeable and relevant to both manufacturing engineers and quality professionals.

What is Last Tooth Error?

Last Tooth Error is identified as a straight vertical line on the tooth flank, running parallel to the gear axis. The mark typically appears at the end of the finish rotary pass, corresponding to 360° rotation of the workpiece. It may appear on a single tooth flank or multiple adjoining flanks.

Salient features include:

  • Linear mark parallel to the gear axis
  • Typical width of 0.1–1.0 mm – Visible under reflected light and distinguishable from feed marks
  • Appears on one or adjoining flanks
  • More pronounced in helical gears than in spur gears

The term “Last Tooth Error” originates from its consistent occurrence at the angular position corresponding to the completion of one full rotary cycle of the workpiece.

Location and Visibility

Unlike classical profile or lead errors, LTE does not necessarily appear at the pitch circle diameter or reference diameter. Its position may shift toward the tooth face or flank, and its length may not extend across the entire face width.

As a result:

  • LTE may escape detection in standard lead and profile measurements
  • Limited inspection sections may miss the defect entirely

The visibility and severity of LTE increase with increasing helix angle, owing to the higher degree of axial and radial synchronisation involved.

Occurrence in Spur and Helical Gears

LTE can occur in both spur and helical gears. In spur gears, the vertical nature of the mark causes it to merge with feed marks, making it narrower and less conspicuous. Consequently, LTE in spur gears is rarely detected through measurement or visual inspection. In contrast, helical gears exhibit clearer and wider LTE marks due to their geometry and motion characteristics.

Distinction Between Last Tooth Error and Sudden Variation

Last Tooth Error is sometimes mistaken for sudden variation. While both may appear as localised deviations on the tooth surface, their origin and behaviour differ fundamentally.

  • LTE appears at a specific angular location corresponding to the completion of a rotary pass
  • Sudden variation can occur randomly at multiple locations
  • LTE is usually not detected by ballpoint measurement
  • Sudden variation is often detectable through ball measurements

Although LTE may be interpreted as a form of sudden variation, not all sudden variations can be classified as Last Tooth Error.

Probable Causes of Last Tooth Error

The occurrence of LTE is primarily associated with synchronisation disturbances and mechanical or control-related instabilities at the end of the generating cycle.

Synchronisation and Control Factors

  • Undershoot or overshoot of the worktable relative to the cutter spindle
  • Momentary stoppage of feed during spindle speed change prior to finish cut
  • Momentary feed interruption during feed rate changes
  • Acceleration–deceleration mismatch or phase lag between leading and following axes at the start or completion of 360° rotation

Mechanical Factors

  • Backlash in the radial slide
  • Hunting or oscillatory movement of the radial slide
  • Shake or looseness in the table slide perpendicular to the X-axis during disengagement
  • Insufficient back-off cam amount, particularly critical for high helix angle gears

Process and Setup Factors

  • Improper timing of the exit spiral, especially during the cutting downstroke
  • Incorrect cutter lateral offset setting at the upright

The sporadic nature of some of these factors explains why LTE may appear on only a few components within a production batch.

Detection Challenges

One of the defining challenges of Last Tooth Error is its inconsistent detectability through standard inspection methods. Reliable identification requires:

  • Careful visual inspection under reflected light
  • Lead and profile measurements taken across at least three axial sections
  • Correlation of deviations at a consistent angular position

Ballpoint measurement alone is insufficient for confirming LTE.

Preventive Practices and Machine Testing

To minimise the occurrence of Last Tooth Error, special attention must be given to machine synchronisation during testing and setup, particularly when using electronic gear linking systems.

Recommended practices include: –

  • Testing synchronisation across multiple cutter-to-work RPM ratios, not limited to 1:1  
  • Verifying performance across the full speed range of both spindles
  • Conducting tests for less than, equal to, and greater than 360° workpiece rotation
  • Performing tests in both rotational directions
  • Alternating leading and following axes during evaluation
  • Correct programming ensuring the cutter exits from the work piece in the finish cut

In addition, ensuring mechanical rigidity, eliminating backlash, providing adequate back-off, and setting correct cutter offsets are essential preventive measures.

Conclusion

Last Tooth Error is a subtle yet distinct manifestation of synchronisation imperfection in the gear shaping process. While it may not always influence functional performance, its presence reflects the dynamic behaviour of the machine–process system, particularly after the generating cycle.

With increasing demands on gear quality and higher helix angles, understanding and controlling LTE has become increasingly important. Through disciplined machine synchronisation, robust mechanical integrity, and thoughtful process setup, Last Tooth Error can be effectively minimised or eliminated.

Vishwajit Rajkumar Kothari, Director Cyber Gear

Vishwajit Rajkumar Kothari is a highly experienced professional in gear manufacturing and CNC machine tools, with over three decades of hands-on industry exposure. His work spans technical sales, application engineering, CNC programming, tooling and fixture development, and machine commissioning. He has led turnkey projects for leading automotive and defence customers and has gained international experience through training and commissioning assignments in Germany and Italy.

Author

error: Content is protected !!